HR Outlook

Our Picks

The EEOC settles for $90,000 in an age discrimination case involving a 49-year-old applicant denied a sales position

A molecular diagnostics company in Wisconsin has agreed to a $90,000 settlement following an allegation by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) of age discrimination against a 49-year-old job applicant. The lawsuit, filed by EEOC in March, claimed that Exact Sciences declined the applicant for a medical sales representative role, citing a preference for “more junior” candidates. According to EEOC, notes from a recruiting consultant indicated the applicant was overqualified. The company then hired a 41-year-old candidate with less experience than the plaintiff.

As part of the settlement, Exact Sciences will introduce additional age discrimination training for hiring managers and ensure that third-party recruiters understand the policies against age bias in hiring. The company, however, maintains its stance, stating that the applicant wasn’t selected for legitimate, non-discriminatory business reasons.

Despite the Age Discrimination in Employment Act’s provisions, age bias remains persistent in workplaces. Throughout 2023, several cases addressing age discrimination have come to light. Fischer Connectors settled for $460,000 in March after allegedly replacing an older HR director with younger workers. IBM faced a suit in September from two older HR workers claiming termination due to age.

Target and the Communications Workers of America settled in May over claims of job advertisements targeting only younger workers through social media.

The ADEA prohibits harassment and discrimination based on age in various aspects of employment, including assignments, promotions, training, and benefits.

EEOC’s director in Denver, Amy Burkholder, emphasized that the ADEA applies to employers utilizing third-party recruiters and that discrimination based on age isn’t permissible.

Despite ongoing reports of age discrimination, efforts to strengthen the ADEA continue. Most recently, a group of House representatives sought to pass the Protecting Older Workers Against Discrimination Act, aiming to reinstate the “mixed-motive” test, allowing complainants to establish age as a motivating factor in unlawful employment practices.

Trending

Continue Reading

Report: Companies Struggling to Meet Workers’ Pay Expectations

According to a report released on October 23 by financial services firm WTW, while employees rank pay as the top reason for joining and staying with a company, only about half of surveyed employers believe they are effectively delivering on their pay programs. This disconnect is attributed to several factors affecting the workplace...

70% of Employers Prioritize Healthcare Cost Controlling Expenses

Employers grapple with rising healthcare costs while prioritizing employee well-being, a Willis Towers Watson (WTW) report notes. As 69% of U.S. employers focus on managing healthcare expenses, strategies to navigate this challenge are multifaceted. Courtney Stubblefield, WTW's Managing Director of Health and Benefits, emphasizes the complexity each employer faces in balancing costs and...

AI Skill Demand Soars, But In Unlikely Areas

The Technology Trends for 2025 report by O'Reilly highlights...

Survey Shows Over Half of Leaders Haven’t Trained in AI

A recent survey by General Assembly revealed that 58%...

Deloitte H-1B Employees Paid 10% Less Than US Workers, Report Reveals

A recent report by researchers from George Mason University,...

What is Culture Fit? The Invisible Agent of Hiring For Long-Term

Culture Fit In a Nutshell The term ‘culture fit’ helps...